Writing 1st person POV
May. 20th, 2016 07:02 pmI love to write in 1st person. I think I am a little bit hooked on it, tbh. I have been writing 1st person Draco for ages, but last year I wrote a lot of alternating 1st person, and really enjoyed that, too, and then this year I felt compelled to write 1st person Harry. With debatable results, BUT, I still very much enjoyed writing it, and wouldn't rule out doing it again.
My
dracotops_harry fic was quite a long 1st person Draco POV, and I noticed a real trend in the comments to talk about the fact that people had liked it despite it being 1st person. This came up again and again, as if it was a complete rarity to enjoy a 1st person fic. Someone also left a bookmark which really made me laugh:
Usually first-persons are stinkers, but this wasn't.
WOW THANKS :D
Anyway, I mentioned to Mr Birds that apparently people felt mistrustful of 1st person, and he was surprised as well. We googled for a list of novels that were written in 1st person, and what do you know, a ton of my favourite books are 1st person. Catcher in the Rye, Jane Eyre, Lolita, Curious Incident of the Dog in the Nighttime, To Kill a Mockingbird, Breakfast at Tiffany's, A Clockwork Orange, The Perks of Being a Wallflower are all 1st person narratives. As a reader I find it a stunningly immersive experience, and if the narrator is unreliable or twisted or damaged then I enjoy it even more.
As a fanfic writer, obviously I'm not aiming for anything approaching those novels, but I find writing 1st person an easy way to make a connection, first with the character I'm writing, and then with the reader. I find writing other POVs distances me and the reader from the story that I'm telling. Maybe it's become a lazy habit and I should attempt to get that immediacy by other means, using 3rd person? I don't know. But I feel conflicted - I want to go on writing 1st person whenever it seems appropriate, but readers are telling me that they actively avoid 1st person fics.
Do people mistrust / dislike 1st person in original fic, or just in fanfic? Do you agree that 1st person fics are usually "stinkers"? If so, why? Do you enjoy reading 1st person? In fic? In original novels? Do you write it? Do you avoid it? I have all of the questions and none of the answers!
My
Usually first-persons are stinkers, but this wasn't.
WOW THANKS :D
Anyway, I mentioned to Mr Birds that apparently people felt mistrustful of 1st person, and he was surprised as well. We googled for a list of novels that were written in 1st person, and what do you know, a ton of my favourite books are 1st person. Catcher in the Rye, Jane Eyre, Lolita, Curious Incident of the Dog in the Nighttime, To Kill a Mockingbird, Breakfast at Tiffany's, A Clockwork Orange, The Perks of Being a Wallflower are all 1st person narratives. As a reader I find it a stunningly immersive experience, and if the narrator is unreliable or twisted or damaged then I enjoy it even more.
As a fanfic writer, obviously I'm not aiming for anything approaching those novels, but I find writing 1st person an easy way to make a connection, first with the character I'm writing, and then with the reader. I find writing other POVs distances me and the reader from the story that I'm telling. Maybe it's become a lazy habit and I should attempt to get that immediacy by other means, using 3rd person? I don't know. But I feel conflicted - I want to go on writing 1st person whenever it seems appropriate, but readers are telling me that they actively avoid 1st person fics.
Do people mistrust / dislike 1st person in original fic, or just in fanfic? Do you agree that 1st person fics are usually "stinkers"? If so, why? Do you enjoy reading 1st person? In fic? In original novels? Do you write it? Do you avoid it? I have all of the questions and none of the answers!
no subject
Date: 2016-05-20 10:08 pm (UTC)As for pondering...getting my MFA made me a much more thoughtful, aware writer, even if it also made the process infinitely more complicated and uncertain. It's probably just as effective to read a great many textbooks and classical novels and then get drunk with a bunch of highly-analytical writer friends at a bar to argue about what you've read (definitely much cheaper, even if you're drinking top-shelf). Although nothing really replicates the sheer soul-destroying misery and terror that is The Workshop. There's nothing like having your story torn to pieces by people who are equally invested in watching you get better because they need you to return the favor and watching you fail so they can be the best. It was excruciating, but I produced some of my best writing while I was there, so it's hard to fault the process. Plus, there's really nothing that anyone can say about my stuff now that I can't blow off.
I think Draco appeals to the part of all of us that can be petty and mean despite the fact that we're not petty and mean people, and he's completely id-enjoyable, if that makes sense. Plus, in some ways, he's very reassuring as a character--no matter how shoddy we are as people, he's done worse, and if he's redeemable, then so are we. Besides, he does have his compensatory qualities, doesn't he? ;D
And I adored Madame Bovary! It was beautiful and sad and Flaubert writes the most perfect sentences. I read it in about 2 days and felt completely insignificant as a writer for like, a week afterwards. The bastard. (And yes, then I had to go try to do all the things he did, albeit with rather less-stellar results). Another one that I found myself in awe of was East of Eden. Have you read it? I'm not actually a huge Steinbeck fan, but I couldn't put that one down.
no subject
Date: 2016-05-22 10:22 pm (UTC)And this! Plus, there's really nothing that anyone can say about my stuff now that I can't blow off.
OMG, that's brilliant. Kind of like kill or cure? I think it would have killed me.
And your thoughts on Draco being redeemable - YES. I keep coming back to this. Here's a quote from the DTH fic Late Bloomers that really resonated with me: He could love Draco Malfoy, probably, not in spite of his flaws and contradictions, but because of them. And that meant that he, too, could be loved for all the dark inside himself in turn.
It's just - UGHHHH. Yes.
And Madame Bovary asdfghklsdfghjklfghjklfghklfghjkl. YES. YES. Can I just say yes to everything in your entire comment? Except East of Eden, which, no, I haven't read. I may have to try it. The annoying thing about Madame Bovary is that I originally read a translation which apparently is out of print now and I can't find my copy. I think I sold it to buy tobacco when i was an impoverished student. *sob* What a dork. And a lot of the lines in the translation I remember were better than the ones in my current copy. It's a bit tragic! Not that the newer translation is anything other than amazing, but still...
no subject
Date: 2016-05-22 10:28 pm (UTC)Madame Bovary: the Everest of translation
no subject
Date: 2016-05-29 03:34 am (UTC)