birdsofshore (
birdsofshore) wrote2013-08-20 08:57 pm
Did Lavender die?
This has been puzzling me lately.
In Deathly Hallows it says:
"Two bodies fell from the balcony overhead as they reached the ground a grey blur that Harry took for an animal sped four-legged across the hall to sink its teeth into one of the fallen. "NO!" shrieked Hermione, and with a deafening blast from her wand, Fenrir Greyback was thrown backward from the feebly stirring body of Lavender Brown. He hit the marble banisters and struggled to return to his feet. Then, with a bright white flash and a crack, a crystal ball fell on top of his head, and he crumpled to the ground and did not move."
So, "feebly stirring" to me, meant that she was injured, perhaps seriously injured, but not dead. When I read it, I expected her to get medical treatment after the Battle was over, and that she would survive.
Then, when I saw the film version of Deathly Hallows, I noticed that it looks as if Lavender is killed by Greyback during the attack. You could argue she is unconscious, or paralysed, but she does look dead. However I just passed it off as either a) making her look more seriously injured to be dramatic, or b) one of those things where the films differ from the books. I don't count film canon as superceding book canon, in any case.
However, when I went to Harry Potter Wiki to check something, (yes, yes, I know it's not exactly the most pre-eminent source, but where else do I look?) they are quite certain that Lav is dead:
"Immediately after the attack, she was seen feebly stirring, but later died from her injuries."
They cite Harry Potter Page to Screen: The Complete Filmmaking Journey as the source for this. I do actually own this book, and it's lovely, but it's freaking massive and I am not trawling through it at the moment to see on whose say-so Lavender allegedly died.
Now, I've seen Lavender alive and kicking in several fanfics lately. I don't want her to be dead. For one thing, I really quite like her, and also, I want to put her in my fic. I know it doesn't matter what Harry Potter Wiki says. If Snape can be resurrected in fic, I am sure Lavender can. But it's annoying me. Hands up who thinks Lavender is still alive at the end of Deathly Hallows? I mean, if you think that's what JKR intended, not just your own personal head canon.
Also, if she's alive, then she's a werewolf, I presume? Or did I get that wrong? Where are all the Were!Lav fics? Probably in those dark and scary comms I never go to. Or is being a werewolf now just one of those annoying little things that we don't mention in polite company, like having a verruca or something?
Come and tell me all the things about Lavender, I beg you!

In Deathly Hallows it says:
"Two bodies fell from the balcony overhead as they reached the ground a grey blur that Harry took for an animal sped four-legged across the hall to sink its teeth into one of the fallen. "NO!" shrieked Hermione, and with a deafening blast from her wand, Fenrir Greyback was thrown backward from the feebly stirring body of Lavender Brown. He hit the marble banisters and struggled to return to his feet. Then, with a bright white flash and a crack, a crystal ball fell on top of his head, and he crumpled to the ground and did not move."
So, "feebly stirring" to me, meant that she was injured, perhaps seriously injured, but not dead. When I read it, I expected her to get medical treatment after the Battle was over, and that she would survive.
Then, when I saw the film version of Deathly Hallows, I noticed that it looks as if Lavender is killed by Greyback during the attack. You could argue she is unconscious, or paralysed, but she does look dead. However I just passed it off as either a) making her look more seriously injured to be dramatic, or b) one of those things where the films differ from the books. I don't count film canon as superceding book canon, in any case.
However, when I went to Harry Potter Wiki to check something, (yes, yes, I know it's not exactly the most pre-eminent source, but where else do I look?) they are quite certain that Lav is dead:
"Immediately after the attack, she was seen feebly stirring, but later died from her injuries."
They cite Harry Potter Page to Screen: The Complete Filmmaking Journey as the source for this. I do actually own this book, and it's lovely, but it's freaking massive and I am not trawling through it at the moment to see on whose say-so Lavender allegedly died.
Now, I've seen Lavender alive and kicking in several fanfics lately. I don't want her to be dead. For one thing, I really quite like her, and also, I want to put her in my fic. I know it doesn't matter what Harry Potter Wiki says. If Snape can be resurrected in fic, I am sure Lavender can. But it's annoying me. Hands up who thinks Lavender is still alive at the end of Deathly Hallows? I mean, if you think that's what JKR intended, not just your own personal head canon.
Also, if she's alive, then she's a werewolf, I presume? Or did I get that wrong? Where are all the Were!Lav fics? Probably in those dark and scary comms I never go to. Or is being a werewolf now just one of those annoying little things that we don't mention in polite company, like having a verruca or something?
Come and tell me all the things about Lavender, I beg you!
no subject
no subject
But I want to know if people think that the BOOK says she died, and if not, does that mean that it's just one of those weird book / film discrepancies?
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
" If a werewolf is in human form and bites the victim, they will merely gain lupine tendencies such as a fondness for rare meat[1]. Any bite or scratch obtained from a werewolf, whether in human or animal form, will leave permanent scars[1]."
and now I remember I have read a lovely fanfic Lavender who does have a taste for raw meat. I don't know why it strikes me as amusing, heh.
I could not find any interview canon. I think it's just this film book that says it, and I will have a hunt in it for the reference at some point. I just think if JKR wanted her dead, she would have killed her properly, you know what I mean?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Now, I have no idea if there are JKR comments or Pottermore stuff anywhere but if there was, I'd think the Wiki people would use that to bolster their arguments.
no subject
"I think canon leaves it vague, then movie!canon does not trump it. Basically I think the burden of proof should be reversed to how they are using it at Wiki. /rant"
and also
"I have no idea if there are JKR comments or Pottermore stuff anywhere but if there was, I'd think the Wiki people would use that to bolster their arguments."
and really, everything you said :DD
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
I agree with you entirely! Let Lavender Live, I say!
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Besides, JKR would have said if she did, she would never leave us hanging there, not knowing if she lived or died and… wait… lol
no subject
LOL at your last sentence. I was definitely not in any doubt about her surviving until I saw the film, and then I thought "OH, you think THAT...? Did I read it wrong, or....?"
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
Birds, read
(no subject)
no subject
But I'm with you, it's the books canon that counts. *nods*
(no subject)
no subject
I can see why the confusion.
If she was feebly stirring, and with the how wizarding medicine can bring people back from the brink of death (sectumsempra), I choose to believe that they got to her in time. And she would have the permanent wolfy injuries like Bill, poor thing.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Also, as a Snarry shipper, I rarely let little details like supposed 'canon death' interfere with what I want to write. *shrugs*
As for were!Lav fics... My favorite is by snegurochka_lee and is called "Lava Girl and the Ink Drop (HERE at DD if you're interested). It's long but it's Lee, so it's totally worth it.
no subject
I rarely let little details like supposed 'canon death' interfere with what I want to write.
I like your style XD
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
But, and I probably should not admit this, whenever there is discrepancy between book canon and movie canon, (I pay little attention to what jkr may have said afterwards) I go with what works best for the story I may be writing. Sometimes I've even gone so far as to have a mixmash of both book and movie canon in the same fic.
I've also found some other strange, imo discrepancies in Harry Potter wiki.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
And I don't take anything to do with the movies as canon. In the movie there was a scene between Trelawney and Parvati in which they acknowledged that Lavender had died, I think, but I don't think that means the same for the book.
She is an awesome character to play with in fic. I really love her and love writing her. She wouldn't be a werewolf, though, because Fenrir was in human form when he attacked her. She'd just be permanently scarred and perhaps prefer her meat a little under-cooked, like Bill.
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
I recall seeing JKR saying somewhere that she died, and the film made it so people wouldn't keep guessing, I think, give some closure to her storyline that she never got from the book. For all we know she could have been one of the dead layed out in the hall but Harry was too busy looking at the Weasleys around Fred's body, and Lupin and Tonks, to pay much attention.
no subject
I don't think JKR has ever commented on it, because interview canon usually gets quoted widely, and that isn't happening here.
I think Harry would have noticed ALL of the dead, I really do. Even if his focus was on his close friends.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
But then, I have my foibles.
I have had many debates on canon vs. secondary canon, however. It's not book canon that Lavender died and therefore I think there is a bit of an open playing field.
Edit: To add many disagree with me on my secondary canon views.
no subject
I knew I liked you. *vbg* Actually Accio and I were just discussing Snape. It's pointed out she's moving a bit while Snape has stopped moving (though, as you say, there is wiggle room for even him).
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
This doesn't stop me from doing other things to her, including having written her out through death, made her into a werewolf, and scarred her emotionally. I love Lavender, and I've written her a bit (as well as RPing her a good bit).
But yeah, in my mind, she lived, but it wasn't a pretty survival.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
Off the top of my head, here is a partial-Were!Lav fic (written by the fabulous Pinky Brown): Kiss Me, I'm Irish
Author’s summary: This story follows immediately on from the events of Pub Crawl and my first fic to focus on someone other than Ron. In the aftermath of the war, Seamus and Lavender find that a friend makes all the difference, especially when they come with benefits.
ETA: Personally, I feel that the books are vague enough so that she could either have lived or died.
no subject
Thank you for the Were!Lav rec! Partial-were!Lav sounds very intriguing.
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Nonetheless... someone (possibly you??) said above that you simply don't say a character 'stirred' in the last scene they're mentioned, if you meant for them to die. That's just weird writing and should never get past a half-decent editor.
She stirred, she lived; had she been frozen/still/unmoving/whatever we'd know she's dead.
It's one of those things. Like the Draco Malfoy's Dark Mark debate. I simply cannot see it as ambiguous. The claim is: we didn't see him show us his Mark; therefore, it's possible he doesn't have one.
It's just... his Dark Mark was used as an actual clue that Harry had to solve in order to figure out Voldemort's actual plan for Draco. And Harry was right and Draco's Dark Mark was instrumental to solving this puzzle. It's just not possible to go back from that and claim, after the book ended, that, lol, no, Draco didn't actually have the Mark; the fact that the idea led Harry to the right conclusion was merely an accident.
No, no, no. Not even the author can contradict the obvious implication of the text like that.
(I'm not saying that one can't explore different possibilities in fics. Of course not! Go for it! I'm just saying that the actual text is clear: Lavender is alive; Draco received the Dark Mark. I'm just... PUTTING MY FOOT DOWN, OKAY.)
Also, yes to the Lavender thing being a Hermione character moment, which, if Lavender had died, would become pointless.
no subject